نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
2 استادیار، علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز،اهواز، ایران
چکیده
مقدمه: به دلیل مواجهه جامعه پژوهش با اطلاعات و بحث تشخیص اطلاعات درست از نادرست که افراد در طی بحران با آن مواجه می‌شوند، پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین رابطه سواد سلامت و سواد سلامت الکترونیک با پذیرش باور توطئه و اضطراب آینده در مواجهه با کووید-19 در بین دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز انجام شده است.
روش بررسی: مطالعه حاضر، پیمایشی از نوع همبستگی بود و بر روی 362 نفر از دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز در سال تحصیلی 1399- 1400 انجام شد. ابزار مورد استفاده، شامل پرسشنامه 32 گویه‌ای در پژوهش Duplaga وGrysztar(2021) بود. داده‌ها با استفاده از آزمون ضریب همسبستگی پیرسون تحلیل شد
یافته‌ها: یافته ها نشان داد سواد سلامت و سواد سلامت الکترونیک با پذیرش باور توطئه و اضطراب آینده رابطه عکس داشتند و افزایش سواد سلامت و سواد سلامت الکترونیک باعث کاهش پذیرش باور توطئه و اضطراب آینده افراد می‌شود.
نتیجه‌گیری: بنابر یافته‌های پژوهش، دانشجویان با سواد سلامت بالاتر، در برابر اطلاعات نادرست و جعلی و اضطراب آینده ناشی از آن و همچنین تئوری‌های توطئه مرتبط با این اطلاعات هوشمندانه‌تر عمل می‌کنند. بنابراین افزایش سواد سلامت و سواد سلامت الکترونیک دانشجویان می‌تواند به مبارزه با پیامدهای منفی و اثرات بد بحران سلامت و بیماری‌های اطلاعاتی کمک کند.
تازه های تحقیق
شهناز خادمی زاده:scholar، pubmed
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Investigating the relationship between health literacy and acceptance of conspiracy beliefs and future anxiety in the face of pervasive diseases
نویسندگان [English]
- shahnaz khademizadeh 1
- Ghazavi Roghayeh 2
- Maryam Aghaei 3
1 MSc Student, Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 MSc Student, Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction: Due to the encounter of the research community with information and the discussion of distinguishing true from false information that individuals face during a crisis, this study endeavors to determine the relationship between health literacy and e-health literacy with the acceptance of conspiracy beliefs and anxiety. The future in the face of covid-19 among graduate students of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz has been conducted.
Methods: The population for this correlational survey study of the research was the post-graduate students of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz in the academic year 2018-2019, which included 362 individuals in the research sample. The instrumentation included a 32-item questionnaire adopted from Duplaga & Grysztar (2021). The data were analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient test.
Results: Correlation analysis test was used to measure the relationship between the variables. It was found that health literacy and e-health literacy had an inverse relationship with acceptance of conspiracy belief and future anxiety, and increasing health literacy and e-health literacy decreased acceptance of conspiracy belief and anxiety.
Conclusion: According to the findings, students with higher health literacy act more intelligently against false and fake information and future anxiety caused by it, as well as conspiracy theories related to the information. Therefore, increasing health literacy and e-health literacy of students can help to fight against the negative consequences and bad effects of health crisis and information diseases.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- health literacy
- electronic health literacy
- conspiracy belief
- future anxiety
- infodemic
The first international conference and the second national conference on management 2020, ethics and business, Shiraz. [In Persian].
2. McBride O, Murphy J, Shevlin M, Gibson‐Miller J, Hartman TK, Hyland P, Levita L, Mason L, Martinez AP, McKay R, Stocks TV, Bennett
KM, Vallières F, Karatzias T, Valiente C, Vazquez C, Bentall RP. Monitoring the psychological, social, and economic impact of the COVID‐
19 pandemic in the population: Context, design and conduct of the longitudinal COVID‐19 psychological research consortium (C19PRC) study.
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 2020; 30(1), e1861.
3. Duplaga M, Grysztar M. The association between future anxiety, health literacy and the perception of the COVID-19 pandemic: A crosssectional study. In Healthcare 2021; 9(1): MDPI.
4. Zaleski Z. Future anxiety: Concept, measurement, and preliminary research. Personality and Individual Differences 1996; 21(2): 165–174.
5. Molin R. Future anxiety: Clinical issues of children in the latter phases of foster care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 1990; 7(6): 501-512.
6. Pew Research Center. “A look at the Americans who believe there is some truth to the conspiracy theory that COVID-19 was planned”, available
at: https://www.pewresearch.org/ fact-tank/2020/07/24/a-look-at-the-americans-who-believe-there-is-some-truth-to-the-conspiracytheory-thatCovid-19-was-planned/(accessed 14 October 2020), 2020.
7. Douglas KM, Uscinski JE, Sutton RM, Cichocka A, Nefes T, Ang CS, Deravi F. Understanding conspiracy theories.Political Psychology 2019; 40: 3-35.
8. Freeman D, Waite F, Rosebrock L, Petit A, Causier C, East A, Jenner L, Teale AL, Carr L, Mulhall S, Bold E. Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs,
mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychological Medicine 2020; 50: 1-30.
9. Allport GW, Postman L. An analysis of rumor. Public opinion quarterly 1946; 10(4): 501 -517.
10. Allington D, Duffy B, Wessely S, Dhavan N, Rubin J . Health-protective behavior, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine 2020; 50: 1-7.
11. Ahmad AR, Murad HR. The Impact of Social Media on Panic During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan: Online Questionnaire Study.
Journal of Medical Internet Research 2020; 22(5): e19556.
12. Abd-Alrazaq A, Alhuwail D, Househ M., Hamdi M., & Shah Z. Top concerns of tweeters during the COVID-19 pandemic: infoveillance study.
Journal of medical Internet research 2020, 22(4), e19016.
13. Yesmin S, Ahmed SZ. Infodemic surrounding COVID-19: Can LIS students recognize and categorize “problematic information” types on social
media?. Digital Library Perspectives 2021.
14. World Health Organization. March 5. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report 45. URL: https://www.who.int/docs/defaultsource/coronaviruse/situationreports /20200305-sitrep-45-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=ed2ba78b_4, 2020.
15. Abel T, McQueen D. Critical health literacy and the COVID-19 crisis. Health promotion international 2020.
16. Naeem SB, Bhatti R. The Covid-19 ‘infodemic’: A new front for information professionals. Health Inf. Libr. J. 2020; 37: 233–239.
17. Abdel-Latif M. The enigma of health literacy and COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health 2020; 185: 95–96.
http://him.mui.ac.ir
رابطه سواد سالمت با پذیرش باور توطئه و اضطراب آینده
54 مدیریت اطالعات سالمت / دوره بیستم / شماره اول/ بهار 1402
18. Sentell T, Vamos S, Okan O. Interdisciplinary perspectives on health literacy research around the world: more important than ever in a time of
COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020; 17(9): 3010.
19. Vraga EK, Tully M, Bode L. Empowering users to respond to misinformation about Covid-19. Media and communication (Lisboa) 2020; 8(2): 475-479.
20. Pickles K, Cvejic E, Nickel B, Copp T, Bonner C, Leask J, Ayre J, Batcup C, Cornell S, Dakin T, Dodd RH, Isautier JMJ, McCaffery KJ.
COVID-19 misinformation trends in Australia: Prospective longitudinal national survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021; 23(1): e23805.
21. Khademizadeh S, Mohammadi Z, Fatehi F. The impact of health literacy of Iranian users on the accuracy of information on COVID-19 in
virtual social networks. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud 2022; 33(1): 8.
22. Delavar F, Pashaeypoor S, Negarandeh R. Health literacy index: A new tool for health literacy assessment. Hayat Journal 2018; 24(1):1-6.
23. Rajah R, Hassali MA, Lim CJ. An interprofessional evaluation of health literacy communication practices of physicians, pharmacists, and nurses
at public hospitals in Penang, Malaysia. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2018; 52(4): 345-351.
24. Mehoudar O. Health literacy, and eHealth literacy: access to health information as a key to equal opportunity in society. Kidum briut in Israel
2014: 25–34.
25. Sihota S. Health literacy: being able to make the most of health. London: National Consumer Council 2004.
26. Tran TV, Nguyen HC, Pham LV, Nguyen MH, Nguyen HC, Ha TH, et al . Impacts and interactions of COVID-19 response involvement, healthrelated behaviours, health literacy on anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life among healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study.
BMJ Open 2020, 10:e041394.
27. Xiao X, Xiao J, Yao J, Chen Y, Saligan L, Reynolds NR, Wang H. The role of resilience and gender in relation to infectious-disease-specific
health literacy and anxiety during the covid-19 pandemic. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2020; 16: 3011.
28. Ying Y, Jing C, Zhang F. The Protective Effect of Health Literacy on Reducing College Students' Stress and Anxiety During the COVID-19
Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2022; 13.
29. Frings D, Sykes S, Ojo A, Rowlands G, Trasolini A, Dadaczynski K., et al. Differences in digital health literacy and future anxiety between
health care and other university students in England during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health 2022; 22(1): 1-9.
30. Paakkari L, Okan O. COVID-19: Health literacy is an underestimated problem. The Lancet. Public Health 2020; 5(5): e249–e250.
31. Rubinelli S, Ort A, Zanini C, Fiordelli M, Diviani N. Strengthening critical health literacy for health information appraisal: An approach from
argumentation theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021; 18(13): 6764.
32. Zarocostas, J. How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet 2020; 395(10225): 676.
33. Duplaga M. The determinants of conspiracy beliefs related to the COVID-19 pandemic in a nationally representative sample of internet users.
International journal of environmental research and public health 2020; 17(21): 7818.
34. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. Journal of Medical Internet Research
2006; 8(2): e9.
)