نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 کارشناسی ارشد، علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
2 دانشیار، علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
چکیده
مقدمه: مطالعه بروندادهای علمی با استفاده از شاخص های علم‌سنجی، ابزاری مؤثر جهت درک تحقیقات علمی است. هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین ساختار و روابط موضوعی مقالات حوزه بهداشت محیط است.
روش بررسی: پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد علم‌سنجی به تحلیل محتوای متون با استفاده از روش هم رخدادی واژگان و تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی انجام شد. جامعه آماری شامل 7438 مقاله نمایه شده در پایگاه Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) در حوزه بهداشت محیط در بازه زمانی 2011-2020 است. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل خوشه‌ای و نمودار راهبردی انجام‌شده است.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها نشان داد که از نظر فراوانی کلیدواژه بهداشت عمومی، آلودگی هوا و تغییرات آب و هوایی بیشترین فراوانی را در پژوهش های حوزه بهداشت محیط داشته است. یافته‌های مربوط به خوشه بندی سلسله مراتبی منجر به شکل گیری 10 خوشه در این حوزه گردید که خوشه های «فلزات سنگین» و «آلودگی هوا» خوشه های با مرکزیت و تراکم بالا مشخص شد.
نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به فراوانی کلیدواژه‌ها و خوشه‌های به‌دست‌آمده از نمودار راهبردی، زمینه‌های موضوعی فلزات سنگین و آلودگی هوا زمینه‌های نوظهور در این حوزه بود. برخی موضوعات مهم و مرتبط با بهداشت محیط نظیر مدیریت بهداشت محیط، مدیریت کیفیت آب، و غیره کمتر به آن توجه شده است.
تازه های تحقیق
فاطمه مکی زاده: scholar، pubmed
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The structure and thematic relationships of articles in the field of environmental health
نویسندگان [English]
- Afsaneh sadat Hashemi 1
- Fathemeh Makkizadeh 2
1 Msc Student, Knowledge and Information Science, Social Science Department, Knowledge and Information Science School, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
2 Associate professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Social Science Department, Knowledge and Information Science School, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction: This research investigates the articles' structure and thematic relationships in environmental health. Studying scientific outputs using scientometric indicators is an effective tool for understanding scientific research.
Methods: The present research was conducted with a scientometric approach to content analysis of texts using the co-occurrence method of words and social network analysis. The statistical population includes 7438 articles indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) in the field of environmental health in the period 2011-2020. Data analysis was done using cluster analysis method and strategic diagram.
Results: The findings showed that in terms of the frequency of public health keywords, air pollution and climate change were the most frequent in environmental health researches. The findings related to hierarchical clustering led to the formation of 10 clusters in this area, and the clusters of "heavy metals" and "air pollution" were identified as clusters with high centrality and density.
Conclusion: According to the abundance of keywords and clusters obtained from the strategic diagram, it was found that the topics of heavy metals and air pollution are emerging fields in this field. Some important issues related to environmental health, such as environmental health management, water quality management, etc., have received less attention.
Keywords: Environmental Health, Thematic Clusters, Thematic Structure, Scientometrics, Co-Word Analysis.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Environmental Health
- Thematic Structure
- Scientometrics
- Co-Word Analysis
- Brusseau ML, Ramirez-Andreotta M, Pepper IL, Maximillian J. Chapter 26 Environmental Impacts on Human Health and Well-Being.
Environmental and pollution science: Elsevier 2019; 477-499.
2. Biranvand A, Samadbeik M, Khasseh A. Mapping of Knowledge Structure in the Field of Health Information Management and Technology: A
Co-Word Analysis. Depiction of Health 2020;11(2):117-36.
3. Yang Y, Wu M, Cui L. Integration of three visualization methods based on co-word analysis. Scientometrics 2012; 90(2): 659-73.
4. Wright CY, Dominick F, Kunene Z, Kapwata T, Street A. Bibliometric trends of South African environmental health articles between 1998 and
2015: Making local research visible and retrievable. South African Medical Journal 2017;107(10):915-924.
5. Rethlefsen ML, Aldrich AM. Environmental health citation patterns: mapping the literature 2008–2010. Journal of the Medical Library
Association: JMLA 2013;101(1):47-54.
6. Zhuang S, Bolte G, Lakes T. Exploring Environmental Health Inequalities: A Scientometric Analysis of Global Research Trends (1970–2020).
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(12):7394.
7. Hu C-P, Hu J-M, Deng S-L, Liu Y. A co-word analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics 2013;97(2):369-82.
8. Gatseva PD, Argirova M. Public health: The science of promoting health. J Public Health. 2011;19(3):205-206.
9. Alengebawy A, Abdelkhalek ST, Qureshi SR, Wang M-Q. Heavy metals and pesticides toxicity in agricultural soil and plants: Ecological risks
and human health implications. Toxics 2021;9(3):42.
10. Organization WH. Water, sanitation, hygiene and health: a primer for health professionals. World Health Organization 2019.
11. Weber N, Martinsen AL, Sani A, Assigbley EKE, Azzouz C, Hayter A, et al. Strengthening healthcare facilities through water, sanitation, and
hygiene (WASH) improvements: a pilot evaluation of "WASH FIT" in Togo. Health security 2018;16(S1):S-54-S-65.
12. Hutton G. Air pollution: global damage costs from 1900 to 2050. How much have global problems cost the world 2013;10:70-98.
13. Maftei C, Muntean R, Poinareanu I. The Impact of Air Pollution on Pulmonary Diseases: A Case Study from Brasov County, Romania.
Atmosphere 2022;13(6):902.
14. Adeloju SB, Khan S, Patti AF. Arsenic contamination of groundwater and its implications for drinking water quality and human health in underdeveloped countries and remote communities—a review. Applied Sciences 2021;11(4):1926.
15. Joe H-E, Yun H, Jo S-H, Jun MB, Min B-K. A review on optical fiber sensors for environmental monitoring.International journal of precision
engineering and manufacturing-green technology 2018;5(1):173-91. - 16. Partoinia A. Getting to know the basics and principles of toxicology and its role in health, safety and environment. New approaches in scientific
laboratories of Iran 2018;2(1):57-66. [in Persian].
17. Shahid M, Nadeem M, Bakhat HF. Environmental toxicology and associated human health risks. Environmental Science and Pollution
Research 2020;27:39671-5.
18. Tufan ZK, Kayaaslan B. Crushing the curve, the role of national and international institutions and policy makersin COVID-19 pandemic.
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 2020;50(9):495-508 .
19. Roland D. Social media, health policy, and knowledge translation. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2018;15(1):149-52.
20. Yazdi Feyzabadi V, Mehrolhassani M, Emami M, Khosravi S. A Review of Approaches to Conceptualize Health and its Determinants: From
Biomedical Approach to One Health Initiative. Iranian Journal of Epidemiology 2018;13:145-54. [in Persian].
21. Mackenzie JS, Jeggo M. The One Health approach—Why is it so important?. Tropical medicine and infectious disease 2019;4(2):88.
22. Cole LW, Foster SR. From the ground up: Environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. NYU Press 2001.
23. Mohai P, Pellow D, Roberts JT. Environmental justice. Annual review of environment and resources 2009;34:405-30.
)