<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Isfahan University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Health Information Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-7853</Issn>
				<Volume>13</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluating the User Interface of Health Literacy Websites in Iran</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Evaluating the User Interface of Health Literacy Websites in Iran</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>108</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>113</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">11501</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Elham</FirstName>
					<LastName>Saljoughi</LastName>
<Affiliation>MSc, Information Technology, School‏ ‏of Health Management and Medical Informatics, ‎Kerman University of Medical ‎Sciences, ‎Kerman, Iran ‎</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-8649-6008</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nona</FirstName>
					<LastName>Aghasi</LastName>
<Affiliation>BSc, Computer, School‏ ‏of Health Management and Medical Informatics, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahdieh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Asadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>MSc, Medical Library and Information Sciences, School‏ ‏of Health Management and Medical Informatics, Kerman University ‎of ‎Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Maryam</FirstName>
					<LastName>Okhovati</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Medical Library and Information Sciences, Physiology Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, ‎Kerman ‎University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran ‎</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-0070-289X</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>15</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Introduction: Since the relationship between the user and the web is through the user interface, it is ‎essential that health websites be user‏-‏centric. The aim of the present study was to identify the ‎strengths and weaknesses of the user interface of health websites in Iran. Methods: This applied and descriptive research was conducted using heuristic method. Based on their ‎Alexa rank and the rate of related pages, 13 health websites were selected. The websites were ‎examined by 5 evaluators (3 graduates in computer sciences and 2 in medical library and ‎information sciences) using a checklist containing 5 major criteria and 27 items. The data were ‎analyzed using descriptive statistics in Excel software. Results: The health literacy websites had observed 63.78% of the criteria of the checklist. The criteria ‎of flexibility (89%), technical features (81%), and aesthetics and visibility (77%) gained the ‎highest scores, respectively. However, the lowest scores belonged to the criteria of help and ‎documentation (36.9%) and responsiveness and interaction (35%). Conclusion: The websites’ user interfaces were in relatively desirable conditions. According to the ‎findings, the criteria of help and documentation and responsiveness and interaction require ‎more attention. It is suggested that these websites resolve the identified problems and ‎minimize the gap between them and the users, so that users can visit these websites more ‎frequently.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Introduction: Since the relationship between the user and the web is through the user interface, it is ‎essential that health websites be user‏-‏centric. The aim of the present study was to identify the ‎strengths and weaknesses of the user interface of health websites in Iran. Methods: This applied and descriptive research was conducted using heuristic method. Based on their ‎Alexa rank and the rate of related pages, 13 health websites were selected. The websites were ‎examined by 5 evaluators (3 graduates in computer sciences and 2 in medical library and ‎information sciences) using a checklist containing 5 major criteria and 27 items. The data were ‎analyzed using descriptive statistics in Excel software. Results: The health literacy websites had observed 63.78% of the criteria of the checklist. The criteria ‎of flexibility (89%), technical features (81%), and aesthetics and visibility (77%) gained the ‎highest scores, respectively. However, the lowest scores belonged to the criteria of help and ‎documentation (36.9%) and responsiveness and interaction (35%). Conclusion: The websites’ user interfaces were in relatively desirable conditions. According to the ‎findings, the criteria of help and documentation and responsiveness and interaction require ‎more attention. It is suggested that these websites resolve the identified problems and ‎minimize the gap between them and the users, so that users can visit these websites more ‎frequently.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">User Interface</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Health Literacy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Websites</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://him.mui.ac.ir/article_11501_0374aee111fb3142383abdfc77c28285.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
