<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Isfahan University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Health Information Management</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1735-7853</Issn>
				<Volume>18</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Evaluating the Performance of Librarians by 360-Degree Feedback Method in the Libraries of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Evaluating the Performance of Librarians by 360-Degree Feedback Method in the Libraries of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>66</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>72</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">11789</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22122/him.v18i2.4328</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Azra</FirstName>
					<LastName>Daei</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD, Medical Library and Information Sciences, Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Management and Medical Information, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-5112-8790</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sona</FirstName>
					<LastName>Imani-Tayebi</LastName>
<Affiliation>MSc, Medical Library and Information Sciences, Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Management and Medical Information, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-0425-0061</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Shahin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mojiri</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD Student, Medical Library and Information Sciences, Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-1267-0824</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyyed Saeed</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mousavifar</LastName>
<Affiliation>MSc, Knowledge and Information Science, Mohseni Public Library Officer, Organization of National Public Libraries Institutions, Hadishahr, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-4648-7558</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Soleymani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Medical Library and Information Sciences, Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-3647-3649</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>10</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Introduction: 360-degree feedback seems to be a more comprehensive view of appraising capabilities, behavior, competence, and performance of individuals in the organization than other methods of performance appraisal. This study endeavored to appraise librarians’ performance in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, through 360-degree feedback.Methods: This study conducted by a survey-analysis methodology. The population consisted of 43 librarians, 43 superiors, 43 colleagues, and 80 users; accordingly, census sampling method was employed. Each librarian was assessed by one supervisor, all colleagues, two users, and a self-assessment questionnaire was filled by each librarian. The data was collected by pre-prepared questionnaires by Farajpahlou et al. To analyze the data. This study employed the Student&#039;s t, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Duncan, analysis of variance tests.Results: Librarians’ performance in total (4.37), and status of their performance in moral-value (4.47), functional (4.37), and process (4.34) skills were higher than average level. There was no significant difference between the results of four groups in the moral-value index and functional skills, but there was a significant difference between the users and other assessors in the process skills.Conclusion: Given the low mean in the process index, it seems necessary to take effective steps by librarians to improve communication with users. These results could be used by managers and librarians to identify the strengths and weaknesses of librarians’ performance.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Introduction: 360-degree feedback seems to be a more comprehensive view of appraising capabilities, behavior, competence, and performance of individuals in the organization than other methods of performance appraisal. This study endeavored to appraise librarians’ performance in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, through 360-degree feedback.Methods: This study conducted by a survey-analysis methodology. The population consisted of 43 librarians, 43 superiors, 43 colleagues, and 80 users; accordingly, census sampling method was employed. Each librarian was assessed by one supervisor, all colleagues, two users, and a self-assessment questionnaire was filled by each librarian. The data was collected by pre-prepared questionnaires by Farajpahlou et al. To analyze the data. This study employed the Student&#039;s t, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Duncan, analysis of variance tests.Results: Librarians’ performance in total (4.37), and status of their performance in moral-value (4.47), functional (4.37), and process (4.34) skills were higher than average level. There was no significant difference between the results of four groups in the moral-value index and functional skills, but there was a significant difference between the users and other assessors in the process skills.Conclusion: Given the low mean in the process index, it seems necessary to take effective steps by librarians to improve communication with users. These results could be used by managers and librarians to identify the strengths and weaknesses of librarians’ performance.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Employee Performance Appraisal</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Feedback</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Librarians</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Libraries</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Iran</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://him.mui.ac.ir/article_11789_b92f8ab7a47e21fb033068842d6663b0.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
