Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Health and Management, Health Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Health Services Management, Health Management and Economics Research center, Faculty of Management and Medical Information, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 PhD Student, Health Services Management, Health Management and Economics Sciences Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 MSc Student, Health Economics, Hospital Management Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

5 MSc Student, Financial Management, Faculty of Financial Sciences, University of Economic Sciences, Tehran, Iran

6 MSc Student, Health Economics, Faculty of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: One of the most important dimensions of communities development is health development, in the other hand, is amount and quality of accessing of people to healthcare services. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and rank the Isfahan towns in terms of access to indices of health sector. Method: In this applied, analytical, cross-sectional Study, all Isfahan towns (n= 23) are surveyed in 2011. Data related to15 health indices were collected from the website of the Ministrry of Health and Medical Education and the Iranian Statistics Center. These indices were weighted by Shannon’s entropy. Finally, SAW (Simple Additive Weighting), TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and VIKOR (Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisn Resenje) technique were used to rank the towns of the Isfahan in terms of access to health sector indicators. Results: Variable of access to health sector indicators is not distributed normally in Isfahan province. On the other hand, there is a great difference among the Isfahan towns in terms of access to health indicators. Shannon’s entropy showed that, the proportion of active treatment centers (weight=0.182) to every 10000 people is the most important indicator. According to Copeland method, the towns of Kashan and Barkhovar were ranked as the first and last in access to health services. Conclusion: According to unbalanced distribution of access to health indicators in Isfahan towns, it suggested that: when health policy makers and officials allocate budget and resources, should Take into account the rankings of towns. Keywords: Health Status Indicators; Techniques; Isfahan

Keywords

  1. Zarrabi A, Shaykh Baygloo R. Classification of Provinces of Iran by Health Indicators. Social Welfare Quarterly. 2011;11(42):107-128. [In Persian]
  2. Shahabi M, Tofighi S, Maleki M. The Nurse and Specialist Physicians Manpower Distribution by Population and Its Relationship with The Number of Beds at Public Hospitals in Iran’s 2006 -2011. Journal of Health Administration. 2010;13(41):7-14. [In Persian]
  3. Sepehrdoust H. Factors Affecting the Development from the Viewpoint of Health Indicators. Health Information Management 2011; 8(2): 258-264. [In Persian]
  4. Tahari Mehrjardi MH, Babaei Mybodi H, Morovati sharifabadi A. Investigation and Ranking of Iranian Provinces in Terms of Access to Health Sector Indicators. Health Information Management 2012; 9(3): 356-369. [In Persian]
  5. Zarabi A, Mohammadi J, Rakhshaninasab H. Spatial Analysis Health Development Indicators. Social Welfare 2007;7(27):213-234. [In Persian]
  6. Zangi Abadi A, Amir Azdi T, Parizadi T. Spitial Analysis Health Development Indicators in Kordistan. Geography 2012;10(32):199-215. [In Persian]
  7. Soares JO, Marquês MML, Monteiro CMF. A multivariate methodology to uncover regional disparities: A contribution to improve European Union and governmental decisions. European Journal of Operational Research. 2003;145(1):121-135.
  8. Zayyari K, Mohamadi A, Atar K. Evaluation of cities development degree and its relationship with the rate of urbanization. Spatial Planning. 2012;1(3):1-16. [In Persian]
  9. Adel A, Rajabzadeh A. Applied Decision MADM Approach. Tehran: NegaheDanesh; 2012. [In Persian]
  10. Badri A, FarajiSabokbar H, Javdan M, H S. Ratingthestability ofrural areasbased onVikor Model. Geography andDevelopment Journal. 2012;10(26):1-19. [In Persian]
  11. Khatami phiruzabaedi A, Mobin M, AbasNezhad S. Approach tomodelingmulti-criteriadecision making,prioritizinglife insurance. Qurterly Journal of Insurance Research College. 20122;26(2):1-32. [In Persian]
  12. Mir Nezhad A, Sokhkian M, Tavari M. Identifying and Prioritizing Factors that Affect Human Resource Productivity by Using MADM Techniques. Journal of Industrial Management. 2009;1(1):71 -88. [In Persian]
  13. Hamouzadeh P, Moradi Hovasin N, Sadeghifar J, Tofighi S. Ranking West Azerbaijan districts regarding utilization of structural indices of health care. The Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. 2013;17(2):41-49. [In Persian]
  14. Bahadori M, Shams L, Sadeghifar J, Hamouzadeh P, Nejati M. Classification of Health Structural Indicators Using Scalogram Model in Golestan Province, Northern Iran. Iranian J Publ Health. 2012;41(5):58-65
  15. Nastaran M. Analysis and measuring degree of concentration and distribution of health indices in Isfahan. Journal of The Faculty of Literature and Humanities University of Isfahan. 2001; (26, 27):145- 162. [In Persian]
  16. Amini S, Yadollahi H, Eynanlu S. Health Rating Provinces of the Country. Social Welfare Quartertly. 2006;5(20):27-48. [In Persian]