مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

سیاست آرشیو و نگهداری داده ها

راهنمای نویسندگان

فرم ها

هزینه انتشار

راهنمای داوران

اثرگذاری‌اجتماعی کاربست تحقیقات پزشکی با رویکرد فراترکیب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، مدیریت اطلاعات و دانش، پردیس بین‌المللی کیش، دانشگاه تهران، جزیره کیش، ایران

2 استادیار گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، آینده‌پژوهی سلامت، مرکز تحقیقات انفورماتیک پزشکی، پژوهشکده آینده‌پژوهی در سلامت دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان. کرمان، ایران.

4 دانشیار، علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: ارزیابی تحقیقات علوم پزشکی، به شدت به سمت ارزیابی اثرگذاری‌‌اجتماعی پیش می‌روند. هدف پژوهش شناسایی مؤلفه‌های مدل اثرگذاری‌اجتماعی کاربست تحقیقات پزشکی است.
روش بررسی: پژوهش برای اولین بار، با رویکرد کیفی فراترکیب به بررسی نظام‌مند و تحلیل پژوهش‌های انجام شده (8 منبع فارسی و 29 منبع انگلیسی با موضوع اثرگذاری ‌اجتماعی کاربست تحقیقات پزشکی) پرداخت. بازه زمانی پژوهش 1990 میلادی تا ژوئن 2022 میلادی برای مقالات خارجی و 1377 تا خرداد 1401 شمسی برای مقالات فارسی است. بر همین اساس 37 منبع از میان منابع موجود برگزیده و تحلیل شدند. به منظور اعتبارسنجی نتایج از ضریب کاپا استفاده شد. سپس بر اساس نتایج حاصل از آن، چارچوب مفهومی شامل مفاهیم و مقوله‎ها در هر یک از منابع مورد بررسی ارائه شد.
یافته‌ها: در نتیجه تحلیل مطالعات انجام شده، یافته‌های پژوهش با 147 کد، 24 مفهوم، 12 مقوله و 6 مضمون شامل «حکمرانی دانش و پژوهش، تولید و تبادل دانش، انتشار و انتقال دانش، بسیج دانش، ترویج دانش و کاربست دانش» است.
نتیجه‌گیری: چارچوب مفهومی اثرگذاری‌ اجتماعی کاربست تحقیقات پزشکی، به منظور آشکارسازی فرایندهای حکمرانی دانش و پژوهش و تولید و تبادل دانش، از الگوی تعاملی، سرمایه رابطه‌ای و نزدیک کردن دنیای پژوهشگران و سیاست‌گذاران به سمت تاکید بیشتر پژوهش‌ها با سرمایه‌گذاری صنعت و دولت شروع می‌شود. این فرایند با انتقال دانش و بسیج دانش به منظور ارزیابی و سنجش، با استفاده از دو راهبرد ساختار شبکه‌های مبادلات رسمی و غیررسمی و استفاده از واسطه‌گران، به تقویت نظام‌های پژوهشی با هدف پاسخگویی به نیازهای جامعه می‌پردازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Social Impact of the Application of Medical Research with Meta-Synthesis Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Najmeh Nazeri 1
  • Ali Shabani 2
  • Mostafa Hossini Golkar 3
  • Alireza Noruzi 4

1 PhD Student, Knowledge and Information Science, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Kish, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Futures Studies in Health,, Medical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: Today, in the field of medical sciences, research evaluation places greater emphasis on assessing social impact. To this end, this research endeavors to identify the components of the social impact model for medical research application.
Methods: This research conducted a systematic review and analysis of previous studies. The research examined 8 Persian and 29 English sources on the social impact of medical research application. This research was carried out through a meta-synthesis approach. The time frame spans from 1990 to June 2022 for English and Persian sources up to the time of conducting the research. From the available sources, 37 were selected and analyzed. The Cohen's Kappa expert agreement coefficient was used to validate the results. Based on these findings, the researcher proceeded to present a conceptual framework that includes key concepts and categories from the reviewed sources.
Results: Analysis of the conducted studies revealed 147 codes across 24 concepts, 12 categories, and 6 themes. These themes encompass various aspects of knowledge, including knowledge governance, knowledge production and exchange, knowledge dissemination and transfer, knowledge mobilization, popularization of knowledge, and knowledge utilization.
Conclusion: The conceptual model of the social impact of medical research application endeavors to reveal the processes of knowledge governance and knowledge production and exchange. It begins with the interactive model, emphasizing relational capital and fostering closer collaboration between researchers and policy makers. This collective approach extends to industry and government investment in research. The overall goal is to enhance research systems, ensuring they meet society’s needs by facilitating knowledge transfer and mobilization. Two key strategies are employed, namely the structure of formal and informal exchange networks, and the utilization of intermediaries.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social Impact
  • Research Utilization
  • Medical Research
  • Meta-Synthesis
مراجع
  1. Hanney S, Packwood T, Buxton M. Evaluating the benefits from health research and development centres: a categorization, a model and examples of application. Evaluation. 2000 Apr;6(2):137-60.
  2. Holbrook JB, Frodeman R. Comparative Assessment of Peer Review (CAPR). EU. InUS Workshop on Peer Review: Assessing “broader impact” in research grant applications. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation 2010.
  3. Honarvar B, Sekhavati E, Bagheri lankerani K. From publication to knowledge translation. Alborzfarjad Publication. Tehran. 2020. [In Persian].
  4. Moffatt S, Phillimore P, Hudson E, Downey D. “Impact? What impact?” Epidemiological research findings in the public domain: a case study from north-east England. Social Science & Medicine. 2000 Dec 15;51(12):1755-69.
  5. Roessner D, McCullough J, Mogee ME, Mohapatra S, Park J, Wagner C, Brandon R. Report on knowledge transfer activities in connection with nanoscale science and engineering.
  6. Castro Martínez E, Molas Gallart J, Fernández de Lucio I. Knowledge transfer in the human and social sciences: the importance of informal relationships and its organizational consequences.
  7. Maas K, Liket K. Social impact measurement: Classification of methods. Environmental management accounting and supply chain management. 2011:171-202.
  8. Atapour H. Measuring the social impact of science: methods, indicators and challenges. The second national science assessment and evaluation conference: quality evaluation of science, technology and industry assessment systems. 2016. [In Persian].
  9. Daneshvari Nasab A. Qualitative meta-analysis of research on application’s barriers of research findings, The first national science assessment conference, the evaluation of scientific research (issues, tools and methods), 2019 April 23. [In Persian].
  10. Peters DH, Tran NT, Adam T. Implementation research in health: A practical guide. World Health Organization; 2013.
  11. Leaflet Knowledge Utilisation. 2019-2020.
  12. Mosadeghrad A, Isfahani P. Facilitators to health policy and management knowledge translation: A scoping review. Payesh (Health Monitor). 2021 Oct 15;20(5):529-48. [In Persian].
  13. Tajadini O, Azami M, Sadatmosavi A. Is it possible to transform science into a product in the humanities? Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science. 2016 Sep 22;18(8):67-94.‎ [In Persian].
  14. Tajadini O, Babolhavaeji F, Sadatmosavi A. What do Iranian humanities experts say about the translation of knowledge? A qualitative study. Library and Information Sciences. 2014 Mar 21;17(1):23-43.‎ [In Persian].
  15. Babalhavaeji F, Tajedini O, Nooshinfard F, Hariri N. Composing self-evaluation tools for knowledge translation related to social science researchers. Academic Librarianship and Information Research. 2013 Mar 21;47(1):49-64. [In Persian].
  16. Sedighi Z, Majdzadeh S, NEJAT S, Fotouhi A, Shahidzadeh A, Gholami Z, Younesian M, Rashidian A, Mesgarpour B, Etemadi A, Yazdani K. Knowledge translation: A model for research utilization. [In Persian].
  17. Jacobson N, Butterill D, Goering P. Development of a framework for knowledge translation: Understanding user context. Journal of health services research & policy. 2003 Apr 1;8(2):94-
  18. Sadatmoosavi A, Tajedini O, Khasseh AA, Shabani A. A qualitative study of the process of knowledge utilization in the social sciences. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM). 2021 Jul 1;19(2):109-23. [In Persian].
  19. Mahmoudi A, Adib Y. Research workshop aimed at thinking: a way to facilitate the application of research findings [Paper presentation]. In National conference on the place of education research in Iran: challenges and opportunities. Malayer university. 2014 May 8. [In Persian].
  20. Kabiri M. Application models of research findings and their role in research management as an interdisciplinary field. 2009 Sep 23;1(4):147-68.‎ [In Persian].
  21. Abedi A, Arizi Samani SHR, Shovakhi A. Metanalysis. Effective factors on increasing the application of research findings in the Ministry of Education. 2005; 12(4): 109-133. [In Persian].
  22. Diehr G, Gueldenberg S. Knowledge utilisation: An empirical review on processes and factors of knowledge utilisation. Global Business and Economics Review. 2017;19(4):401-19.
  23. Estabrooks CA, Chong H. The utilization of health research results in Alberta: Extension of a national survey. Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta; 2003.
  24. Akrami F, Bahadoran Z. Ethical considerations in publishing and applying research results. 2016 October 23; 81-89. [In Persian].
  25. Karimian Z, Sabaghian Z, Salehsedghpoor B. Examining the obstacles and challenges of research and science production in universities of medical sciences, Iranian Higher Education. 2012; 3(4). [In Persian].
  26. Yazdizadeh B, Majdzadeh SR. A brief review: How can the use of knowledge obtained from research be increased through medical science journals? Iran Journal of Nursing. 2009; 61(22). 94-95. [In Persian].
  27. Minogue V, Matvienko-Sikar K, Hayes C, Morrissey M, Gorman G, Terres A. The usability and applicability of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks for research in the context of a national health service. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2021 Dec; 19:1-4.
  28. Prihodova L, Guerin S, Tunney C, Kernohan WG. Key components of knowledge transfer and exchange in health services research: findings from a systematic scoping review. Journal of advanced nursing. 2019 Feb;75(2):313-26.
  29. Ojagh Z., Sheikh Jabbari M. M., Vesali M., Zare M., & Dorostian, A. On the essence and necessity of public understanding of science. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education. 2013; 14(56), 117-132. [In Persian].
  30. Atapour H, shiravand Z, Zavaraqi R. Comparison of the social impact of review articles with original research articles indexed in the Web of Science in Pharmacy, biology, psychology, and agriculture fields. Human Information Interaction. 2019; 5 (4). [In Persian].
  31. Zheng H, Pee LG. Research knowledge utilisation for societal impact: Information practices based on abductive topic modelling. Journal of Information Science. 2024 Feb;50(1):129-44.
  32. Doulani A, Behpour M, Abam Z. Comparison of the social impact of review articles with original research articles in the field of library and information science indexed in WoS. Journal of Scientometric Research. 2022 Sep;11(3):384-92.
  33. Fecher B, Hebing M. How do researchers approach societal impact? PLOS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7): e0254006.
  34. Smit JP, Hessels LK. The production of scientific and societal value in research evaluation: a review of societal impact assessment methods. Research Evaluation. 2021 Jul 1;30(3):323-35.
  35. Mostert SP, Ellenbroek SP, Meijer I, Van Ark G, Klasen EC. Societal output and use of research performed by health research groups. Health research policy and systems. 2010 Dec; 8:1-0.
  36. Salahi S, Ghasemi V, Hemati R. Exploring social impact assessment implementation process with an approach based on grounded theory. Journal of Social Problems of Iran. 2018 Apr 21;9(1):143-63.
  37. Jamali HR. Comparison of models and frameworks of medical research impact assessment. Health Information Management, 9(5), 757-767. [In Persian].
  38. Kah S, Akenroye T. Evaluation of social impact measurement tools and techniques: a systematic review of the literature. Social Enterprise Journal. 2020 Dec 1;16(4):381-402.
  39. Corvo L, Pastore L, Manti A, Iannaci D. Mapping social impact assessment models: A literature overview for a future research Agenda. Sustainability. 2021 Apr 23;13(9):4750.
  40. Pedersen DB, Grønvad JF, Hvidtfeldt R. Methods for mapping the impact of social sciences and humanities - A literature review. Research Evaluation. 2020 Jan 1;29(1):4-21.
  41. Nazeri N, Developing a model for the social impact of medical research utilization [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Tehran: 2024. [In Persian].
  42. Van der Meulen B, Rip A. Evaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands. Research evaluation. 2000 Apr 1;9(1):11-25.
  43. Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company; 2006 Jul 24.
  44. Yari S, Designing and explaining the model of information resource selection behavior among adolescent members of Iranian public libraries [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Tehran: September 2021. [In Persian].
  45. Baghmirani M. Developing and clarification of research problem finding model (A caste study of Information Science and Knowledge Studies) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Tehran: January 2018. [In Persian].
  46. Jafari Baghiabadi J, Designing an inter-organizational knowledge sharing model in the Tehran smart city (Case study: Socio-cultural organizations) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Tehran: November 2023. [In Persian].
  47. Lavis J, Ross S, McLeod C, Gildiner A. Measuring the impact of health research. Journal of health services research & policy. 2003 Jul 1;8(3):165-70.
  48. Van Wetenschappen KN, Gezondheids S. The societal impact of applied health research: Towards a quality assessment system. Council for Medical Sciences; 2002.
  49. Jamali H. R. (2012). Comparison of models and frameworks of medical research impact assessment. Health Information Management, 9(5), 757-767.
  50. Feizabadi M, Assessing the impact of Iranian’s clinical trials [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Tehran: September 2017. [In Persian]..
مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت
دوره 20، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 90
دی 1402
صفحه 205-213
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار