Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Library and Information Sciences, School of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran AND Instructor, Payam Noor University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
2 Lecturer, Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Management and Medical Information, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan AND PhD Student, Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author) Email: nouri@mng.mui.ac.ir
3 Lecturer, Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Management and Medical Information, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
4 MSc Student, Library and Information Sciences, School of Psychologic and Education Sciences, The University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
5 MSc Student, Scientometrics, School of Human Sciences, University of Shahed, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: Library software is a computer-based program that is used in libraries and information
centers for information storage, processing and retrieval. Interface environment is a part of library
software that establishes connection between computer and user and also shifts information between user
and the system. The present study aimed to determine the attitudes of librarians in Isfahan University of
Medical Sciences towards the specifications of Pars Azarakhsh library software interface in 2009.
Methods: A questionnaire was used for data collection, consisting of 51 closed questions. The study
population included the librarians in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Librarians were all those
who were working in libraries of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (n = 50). Descriptive statistics
methods and correlation test were used for data analysis.
Results: The results of this research showed that librarians believed some factors like pageant, vocabulary
and messages of software as well as learning how to use software were in medium and upper than
medium. Moreover, librarian's attitude toward help and other capabilities was lower than medium. All the
librarians believed that Pars Azarakhsh software user interface environment was medium (3.20). In
addition, there was a non-significant difference between Pars Azarakhsh software user interface and
computer literacy of librarians. There was a significant difference between letters and messages of
software and library literacy of librarians and there was no significant difference between other variables
of Pars Azarakhsh software user interface and library literacy of librarians.
Conclusion: Findings showed that librarians' view about Pars Azarakhsh variables was at medium level.
Among these variables, some such as how to work with software, pageant, vocabulary, and messages of
software were in the best situation. However, help features and other capabilities need to be developed more.
Keywords
Development of Library Softwares in Iran; 1999 Nov18-19; Mashhad, Iran; 1999. [In Persian].
2. Zerehsaz M, Fattahi R, Davarpanah MR. Survey and Analysis of Ingredients and Traits in Simorq Software
Interface and Determining of Psychology Faculty of Ferdowsi University Students' Satisfaction from this
Software. Journal of Library and Information Sciences 2006; 36 (4): 127-150. Library and Information Science
2006; 9(4): 127-50. [In Persian].
3. Accretion in Library Software’s. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. National Library of Iran;
2003 [cited 2011 Sep 14]; Available from: URL: http://portal.nlai.ir/daka/Wiki.aspx /[In Persian]. 4. Zerehsaz M, Fattahi R. Fundamental Regards in Designing User Interface of Computer Systems and Databases.
Faslnameh Ketab 2006; 17(2): 251-68. [In Persian].
5. Rahimi A. Prosperity and Efficiency of Computer Systems, Scales for Evaluation of Library Softwares.
Proceedings of the Congress Usage and Development of Library Software’s in Iran; 1999 Nov18-19; Mashhad,
Iran; 1999. [In Persian].
6. Fattahi R, Parirokh M. Survey and Evaluation of Quality of Information Display in Interior Computerized
Cataloges and Offering Some Guidance for its Improvement. Proceedings of the Congress Usage and
Development of Library Software’s in Iran; 1999 Nov18-19; Mashhad, Iran; 1999. [In Persian].
7. Mehrad J, Asari Shahr R. Measuring satisfaction rate of Shiraz University Students with Pars Azarakhsh
(OFOGH) user interface and analysis of some of its significant design elements. Information Sciences &
Technology 2007; 23(1-2): 1-22. [In Persian].
8. Tabarsa F, Nowkarizi M. Examination and Analysis of the Extent of Factors Influencing Librarians' Perception of
the Terms used in Graphic User Interface of Simorgh Library Software. Information Sciences & Technology
2009; 25(2): 227-47. [In Persian].
9. Hashemzadeh MJ, Yeganehfar M. Analysis of the Users' Understanding of Icons in Graphical User Interface of
Simorgh Software. Research on Information Sciences & Public Libraries 2010; 16(62): 123-45. [In Persian].
10. Chan J. An Evaluation of Displays of Bibliographic Records in OPACs in Canadian Academic and Public
Libraries. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto. Faculty of Information Studies; 1995.
11. Ahmed SM, McKnight C, Oppenheim C. A study of learning and retention with a web-based IR interface.
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 2005; 37(1): 7-16.
12. Zerehsaz M, Fattahi R. Effectives on Proce of Helping and Users' Usage from Help on Databases. Library and
Information Science 2008; 11(3): 71-96. [In Persian].
)