When Scientometric Metrics Become the Goal of Research

Criticizing indexation does not mean completely rejecting scientometric indicators. If used correctly, these indicators can be useful tools for analyzing patterns of science production and helping research policy-making. The main issue is when these tools replace scientific judgment and qualitative assessment. A balanced strategy is to consider quantitative indicators alongside criteria such as clinical effectiveness, impact on health policies, solving local problems, and the extent of scientific collaboration. Ultimately, it seems that the challenge of indexation in the life sciences should be seen as a symptom of a deeper problem: The crisis of meaning and responsibility in scientific activity. Returning to the social mission of science requires reforming evaluation systems, strengthening the culture of research integrity, and emphasizing the teaching of professional ethics alongside technical skills. In this regard, the role of professors as behavioral models is of particular importance, because scientific culture is transmitted through practical models rather than being shaped through regulations. If prominent researchers can demonstrate that reaching the frontiers of knowledge and responding to the real needs of society are aligned goals, perhaps the path of science can be guided from a mere competition for indicators to a real impact on human lives.