Document Type : مقاله مروری نظام مند

Authors

1 MSc Student, Scientometrics, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, School of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Information Technology, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, School of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Scientometrics, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, School of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Studying the growth of scientific outputs in different subject areas can be one of the foundations of scientific policymaking in that field. Systematic reviews are of the main research outputs in medical sciences, and they are finding more applications. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the growth trend of these articles in the field of biomedicine.Methods: The present study was carried out using documentary method; and in the process of systematic review of biomedical articles, the distribution of scientific products by language was assessed. The statistical society consisted of all systematic review articles by Iranian researchers in biomedical fields. 350 Persian articles were recovered and analyzed from the Islamic World Science Citation Center (ISC) and Scientific Information Database (SID), as well as 2595 English articles from Scopus database.Results: The average growth rate of systematic reviews in biomedical sciences by Iranian researchers was increasing; so that the approximate growth rate was 0.06 (6%) and 0.21 (21%) in Persian and in English articles, respectively, indicating that the growth rate of Latin articles was three and a half times that of Persians. The most widely cited Persian language journal was the Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Infertility with 46 articles, and that of English language was the Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention with 58 articles.Conclusion: Iranian systematic review articles in the field of biomedicine have grown in recent years, and English-language journals are the main outlets for publishing such articles.

Keywords

  1. Shannon S. Critical appraisal of systematic reviews. Can Assoc Radiol J 2002; 53(4): 195-8.
  2. Strech D, Sofaer N. How to write a systematic review of reasons. J Med Ethics 2012; 38(2): 121-6.
  3. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Online]. [cited 2018 Dec 10]; Available from: URL: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
  4. Biomedicine (applies biological, physiological) – Memidex dictionary/thesaurus [Online]. [cited 2018 Dec 16]; Available from: URL: http://www.memidex.com/biomedicine+applies-biological-physiological
  5. Sheikhzadeh P, Zareh Gavgani V. A review of published articles in the field of biomedical nanotechnology in medline database during 2000-2010. Depiction of Health 2012; 3(1): 47.-52. [In Persian].
  6. Kiaee R. Investigation on publication rate and citation analysis of Iranian scientific articles in humanities area in SCOPUS during 2001 2010 [MSc Thesis]. Tehran, Iran: Tarbiat Modares University, Faculty of Management and Economics; 2011. [In Persian].
  7. Khodadoost R. A study on the status of publishing, co-authoring and co-authoring of scientific products of the nano-sphere of the Islamic Republic of Iran [MSc Thesis]. Tehran, Iran: Tarbiat Modares University, Faculty of Management and Economics; 2011. [In Persian].
  8. Ommati E, Asnafi AR. Study the research trend in evidence based medicine filed based on scopus database. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics 2015; 1(2): 39-48. [In Persian].
  9. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: How will we ever keep up? PLoS Med 2010; 7(9): e1000326.
  10. Vaziri E, Feizabadi M. Scientometric study of the Iranian medical sciences systematic reviews. Journal of Scientometrics 2018; 3(2): 83-96. [In Persian].
  11. Kazerani M, Davoudian A, Zayeri F, Soori H. Compliance ratio between the abstracts of Iranian systematic reviews and meta-analysis indexed in Web of Sciences and PRISMA Statement. J Health Adm 2015; 18(61): 7-16. [In Persian].
  12. Signore A, Annovazzi A. Scientific production and impact of nuclear medicine in Europe: How do we publish? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004; 31(6): 882-6.
  13. Mousavi Chalak A, Yaminfirooz M, Riahi A. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of Islamic Republic of iran's scientific productions indexed in Scopus in the field of nursing during 2000-2016. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2018; 12(4): 61-71. [In Persian].
  14. Abazari Z, Riahi A, Sohbatiha F, Siamian H, Yamin Firoz M. A comparative study of medical journals and articles growth in Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office Member Countries. Payavard 2015; 9(3): 235-48. [In Persian].
  15. Abdekhoda H, Ghazi MirSaeed S, Nourzi A. Evaluation of scientific production of Iranian medical domain based on the document indexed from scientific journals in chosen databases, between 2005-2009. Payavard 2010; 4(1-2): 18-30. [In Persian].
  16. Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. J Family Med Prim Care 2013; 2(1): 9-14.