Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 1- PhD student in Organizational Behavior Management, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran.

2 Full Professor, Department of Media Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Management Department, Semnan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran

4 Professor, Biostatistics Department, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Employees play a crucial role as key assets of organizations in achieving objectives and enhancing service quality. Modern organizations are redesigning their structures with a human-centered approach to improve employee experience. This research develops a model for managing employee experience in the health sector and presents an innovative framework.

Method: This descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study was conducted from October to December 2023, involving 400 employees from Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Participants were selected using a convenience sampling method, and data were collected through a researcher-designed questionnaire sent via organizational email. Analyses were performed using SPSS25 and Smart PLS software. Hypotheses were formulated based on the impact of dimensions (organizational, job-related, individual, cultural, technological, physical environment, management, and supervision) on managing employee experience. The validity and reliability of the model were assessed, and the significance of the hypotheses was examined.

Findings: Among the respondents, 61.3% were female, and 37% held a bachelor's degree. The average work experience was calculated at 14.59 years (±7.90). A total of 72 items were validated, and all relevant indices exceeded standard values for validity and reliability assessment. The results showed that all dimensions had a positive and significant impact on managing employee experience (p<0.001), with organizational factors having the highest effect size (0.305).

Conclusion: This research underscores the necessity of a comprehensive approach to managing employee experience, highlighting that organizational, cultural, and managerial dimensions enhance employee satisfaction and productivity. Addressing individual and job-related needs can improve organizational performance and reduce occupational burnout.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Absalan Z, Gholipour A. Understanding the employees lived experiences of workspace: A phenomenological research. Iranian journal of management sciences. 2021;16(63):31-52. [In Persian]
  2. Tucker E. Driving engagement with the employee experience. Strategic HR Review. 2020;19(4):183-7.
  3. Batat W. The employee experience (EMX) framework for well-being: An agenda for the future. Employee Relations: The International Journal.2022; 44(5):993-1013.
  4. Morgan J. The employee experience advantage: How to win the war for talent by giving employees the workspaces they want, the tools they need,and a culture they can celebrate: Hoboken:John Wiley & Sons; 2017.
  5. Farrokhi P, Rahmani H, Aryankhesal A, Bagherzadeh R, Asghari M, Aghaei Hashjin A. Investigation of Outpatient Service Quality in Hospitals Affiliated with Iran University of Medical Sciences in 2020: A Short Report. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2022;21(7):785-94. [In Persian]
  6. hassanpoor A, Jafarinia S, vakili y, Ghalebani E. Identifying And Prioritizing The Dimensions And Components Of Employee Experience: A Meta Synthesis And Fuzzy Delphi Approach. Iranian journal of management sciences. 2023;18(69):1-26. [In Persian]
  7. Basar D. The Relationship Between Employee Experience and Employee Engagement with The Moderating Role of Positive Affect in Finance Sector. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2024 Sep 1;24(5):908-15.
  8. Panneerselvam S, Balaraman K. Employee experience: The new employee value proposition. Strategic HR Review. 2022;21(6):201-7.
  9. Gheidar Y, ShamiZanjani M. The Pattern of Factors Affecting the Formation of Digital Employee Experience. Journal of Human Resource Management. 2020;10(3):23-50. [In Persian]
  10. Pangallo A, Atwell T, Roe K, Boissy A. Understanding modern drivers of the employee experience in healthcare. Patient Experience Journal.2022;9(2):46-61.
  11. Toraji R, Jabbari asl S, Ezadpanah N. Developing a Model for Selecting Managers with an Emphasis on Talent Management in the Ministry of Health and Medical Education of Iran. Journal of healthcare management. 2021;12(2):17-30. [In Persian]
  12. Najib Jalali M, Vafaee Najar A, Jamali J, Hooshmand E. Developing a Model for Evaluating Patient Experience in Educational Hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Management Strategies in Health System. 2021;6(1):28-39. [In Persian]
  13. Ghadam Kheyr V, Farhangi AA, Danaee A, Shakeri MT. Fuzzy Interpretive Structural Modeling regarding Factors Affecting Employees’Experience Management in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Management Strategies in Health System. 2024;9(1):32-45. [In Persian]
  14. Romero Jeldres M, Díaz Costa E, Faouzi Nadim T, editors. A review of Lawshe’s method for calculating content validity in the social sciences.Frontiers in Education; 2023: Frontiers Media SA.
  15. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research.1981;18(1):39-50.
  16. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications; 2011.
  17. Werts CE, Linn RL, Jöreskog KG. Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological measurement.1974;34(1):25-33.
  18. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science. 1988;16:74-94.
  19. Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1998.
  20. Hair Jr JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Danks NP, Ray S. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook: Springer Nature; 2021.
  21. Nunnally JC. An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders: A handbook. 1978:97-146.
  22. Makoni ET. Employee engagement strategies that healthcare managers use to increase organizational performance: Walden University; 2019.
  23. Vereb D, Krajcsák Z, Kozák A. The importance of positive employee experience and its development through using predictive analytics. Journal of Modelling in Management. 2024.
  24. Grover A, Chawla G. Antecedents of Employee Experience: A Systematic Review of Literature. Management Dynamics. 2022;22(2):90-100.
  25. Jelen A, Goldfarb R, Rosart J, Graham L, Rubin BB. A qualitative co-design-based approach to identify sources of workplace-related distress and develop well-being strategies for cardiovascular nurses, allied health professionals, and physicians. BMC Health Services Research. 2024;24(1):246.
  26. Rollins AL, Eliacin J, Russ-Jara AL, Monroe-Devita M, Wasmuth S, Flanagan ME, et al. Organizational conditions that influence work engagement and burnout: A qualitative study of mental health workers. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2021;44(3):229.
  27. Zellars KL, Perrewe PL, Hochwarter WA. Burnout in health care: The role of the five factors of personality. Journal of applied social psychology. 2000;30(8):1570-98.
  28. Azizi H, Lemski IT. The Effect of Environmental Factors on Staff Productivity in Office Space; Case Study: Information Technology Companies of Iran. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development. 2020;12(29). [In Persian]
  29. Mobaraki H, Meymandi RG, Kamali M, Pourbakht A. The relationship between quality of work life and job satisfaction among audiologists in Iran.Auditory and Vestibular Research. 2017;26(4):215-22. [In Persian]
  30.