Validation and prioritization of dimensions of the IT management excellence model at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences using a structural equation modeling approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Asefeh Haddadpoor 1
Iraj Soltani 2
Akbar Nabiollahi 3
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Management, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Educational Management Department, Isfahan Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, IranAssistant Professor, Educational Management Department, Isfahan Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 Assistant Professor ,Computer Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
10.48305/him.2025.45440.1320
Abstract
Abstract:
Introduction: Effective management of information technology in the health system requires the use of indigenous and validated excellence models that correctly identify and prioritize key dimensions of this area. This study was conducted with the aim of validating the excellence model of information technology management and determining the priority of its dimensions from the perspective of stakeholders of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
Methodology: The present study was an applied, descriptive-survey study of correlation type, with a quantitative approach and structural equation modeling. The statistical population consisted of 1575 managers and experts of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, of whom 309 were selected using simple random sampling. Data were collected with a researcher-made questionnaire consisting of 140 items in a 14-dimensional format and analyzed with SmartPLS software. Model validation was performed with confirmatory factor analysis and prioritization of dimensions by combining path coefficients, factor loadings, and effect size (f²).
Findings: The results indicated a good fit of the model and appropriate validity and reliability of the constructs. Also, the dimensions of “IT service portfolio management”, “IT systems management”, “health data management” and “security and confidentiality” had the highest priority, while the dimension of “human resources and employees” had the lowest priority.
Conclusion: The research model has acceptable statistical validity and prioritizing its dimensions can be the basis for effective planning of IT management in medical universities (especially in conditions similar to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences). However, generalizing the results to other universities requires conducting additional studies in different environments.
Keywords: Information Technology, Excellence Model, Validation

Key Message: In this study, the IT management excellence model in the health system was validated, and its dimensions were prioritized to support targeted planning in IT management.

Running Title: Validation of the IT Excellence Model

Keywords

Subjects

1. Sligo j, Gauld R, Roberts V, Villa L. A literature review of large-scale health information system project planning, implementation and evaluation.
International journal of medical informatics. (2017); 97(2017): 86-97.
2. Mustafa MM, Goyal KK. Diversity of Information Technology Management Sophistication in Financial Service Industry. International Journal of
Advanced Networking and Applications. 2020; 12(1):4532-6.
3. Palvia P, Lowe K, Nemati H, Jacks T. Information technology issues in healthcare: hospital CEO and CIO perspectives. Communications of the
Association for Information Systems. 2012;30(1):19.
4. Mirzaee A, Hoseini F. Investigating the impact of information technology on the health system and health information management. The 7th
International Conference on Research in Management, Economics and Development. https://civilica.com/doc/1041639. [in persian]
5. Mimbi L, Bankole F.O. (2015). ICT and health system performance in Africa: A multi-method approach.
6. Derakhshan S, Dalvi M, Dehghan M. Management of project investment portfolio and IT projects. Journal of Health Information Management.
(2016);12(2):150-161. [in persian]
7. Keshvari H, Hadadpour A, Aghdak P, Taheri B, Nasri M. Feasibility of implementing telemedicine according to the elements of strategic planning
in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Health Inf Manage. 2015;12(5):635. [in persian]
8. Sheikhabumasoudi R, Koohihabibi S, Ataee M, Esmaeeli N. Evaluation of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences' Information Management
Systems Using ISO/IEC 27001 Standard, Journal of Health Information Management. (2015);12(3):306-316. [in persian]
9. Abarghooian M, Hashemian M, Hodhodinezhad N, Fotoohi Z, Noroozi A. Journal of Health Information Management. (2018);14(2):65-70. [in
persian]
10. Rahimi A, Soleymani M, Hashemian A. Evaluating the quality of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences digital library services from the users'
perspective using the DigiQual model. Journal of Health Information Management. (2019);15(1):46-49. [ in persian]
11. Shahzeydi A, Hadian Z, Farzi S, Babaei S. Nursing Students' Experiences of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Virtual Education: A Qualitative
Content Analysis Study. Education and Ethics In Nursing ISSN: 2322-5300. 2024;13(3-4):49-64. [in persian]
12. Ehsanifarid E, Gheitani A, Ebrahimzade R, Hadipeykani M. Investigating discourses and analyzing the situation of human resource management
information systems in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences: a qualitative study. Health Information Management. 2023;20(2):100-7. [in persian]
13. Hajialiasgari F, Tabatabeean SH, Taghva MR, Abolhasani F. Policies for developing an information technology maturity model in healthcare
organizations based on ITIL. Public policymaking. (2017); 3(4): 29-50. [in persian]
14. Borges do Nascimento IJ, Abdulazeem H, Vasanthan LT, Martinez EZ, Zucoloto ML, Østengaard L, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Zapata T, Novillo-Ortiz
D. Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals. NPJ digital medicine. 2023 Sep 18;6(1):161.
15. Otto L, Whitehouse D, Schlieter H. On the road to telemedicine maturity: a systematic review and classification of telemedicine maturity models.
16. World Health Organization. Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Contract No.: Licence: CC
BY-NC-SA. 2023;3.
17. Otto L, Schlieter H, Harst L, Whitehouse D, Maeder A. The telemedicine community readiness model—successful telemedicine implementation
and scale-up. Frontiers in Digital Health. 2023 Feb 23;5:1057347.
18. García Aranda JR, García Márquez FP. Use of excellence models as a Management Maturity Model (3M). InAdvanced Business Analytics 2014
Dec 6 (pp. 165-179). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
19. Hoseini MH, Akbari M. Designing an organizational knowledge management excellence model with an interpretive-structural modeling approach.
Information Technology Management Journal (2014);6(3): 351-374. [in persian]
20. Haddadpoor A, Soltani I, Nabi-alahi A. Compilation of key components and indicators of information technology management excellence model in
the University of Medical Sciences. Health Information Management. 2023;20(1):4-13.[in persin]
21. Tavakol M, Wetzel A. Factor Analysis: a means for theory and instrument development in support of construct validity. International journal of
medical education. 2020 Nov 6;11:245.
22. Hair JF. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). sage; 2014.
23. Shoari MR, Emamjomezadeh MH. What is a Project Portfolio Management (PPM) system and why?. 2009; Available from:
https://sid.ir/paper/809579/fa. [in persian]
24. Roberts P, Hamilton Edwards L. Portfolio management: A new direction in public sector strategic management research and practice. Public
Administration Review. 2023 Jul;83(4):947-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13633
25. Shahmansoori M, Nabiolahi A, Khani N. Identification of factors affecting success of IT strategic planning (ITSP);(case study: in National Iranian
Oil Company). Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management. 2018 Feb 20;33(2):517-48.[in persian]
26. Sadr SSH, Zahedi E, Sadr SR. Managing Transformation in the Health System: Challenges and Solutions. Culture and health promotion (2023);
7(4): 562-57 [in persian]
27. Stiri M. Identifying key factors affecting the use of cloud computing (Case study: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences). 2018; Available from:
https://civilica.com/doc/763404
28. Gomes J, Romão M. Information system maturity models in healthcare. Journal of medical systems. 2018 Dec;42(12):235.
29. Ofosu D, Owusu A, Boateng R. Examining the factors influencing the achievement of IT-business alignment in a developing economy: Evidence
from Ghanaian Public Universities. The African Journal of Information Systems. 2021;13(2):4.
30. Sarmadi A, Hasanzadeh M, Hariri N. Critical success factors for knowledge management in the banking industry using meta-synthesis. 2024; 10(1):
31-60. [in persian]
31. Farahmandian V, Farahmandian M, Mehrabanfar E, Afkhami M. The role of information and communication technology in Iranian health
management with a look to the future. Smart Business Management Studies. (2014); 3(10): 21-38. [in persian]
32. Molaee B. The role of information technology in improving healthcare services management. 16th International Conference on Health, Treatment
and Health Promotion. Available from https://civilica.com/doc/2009763. [in persian]
33. Soltani Z, Raoofi S, Yoosefi Y, Hasanzadeh E. The impact of information technology use on patient safety and healthcare delivery in Iran: A review
study. The First Conference on Information Technology and Health Promotion. Available from https://civilica.com/doc/76152. [in persian]
34. Ebrahimijozani M. Investigating the impact of alignment between business and project strategy on the success of information and communication
technology projects. Management Science Research (2023); 15(5): 137-148. [in persian]
35. Manaviamin MR, Mikaeeli F, Taghavifard MT. Explaining the strategic alignment of information technology with the organization's strategy in
social security hospitals in Zanjan province. Scientific Journal of Modern Research Approaches in Management and Accounting. (2023); 7(26): 35-
5. [in persian]
36. Wu JH, Chen YC, Greenes RA. Healthcare technology management competency and its impacts on IT–healthcare partnerships development.
International journal of medical informatics. 2009 Feb 1;78(2):71-82.
37. Jose A, Tortorella GL, Vassolo R, Kumar M, Mac Cawley AF. Professional competence and its effect on the implementation of healthcare 4.0
technologies: scoping review and future research directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022 Dec
28;20(1):478.
Health Information Management
Volume 22, Issue 2
Summer 2025
Pages 63-73