ارائه مدل برنامه‌ریزی قابلیت بر اساس فرایند مدیریت معماری سازمانی کوبیت (مطالعه موردی: مدیریت فاوای دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
سمیه درخشان 1
اکبر نبی الهی 2
ناصر خانی 3
سید رئوف خیامی 4
1 دانشجوی دکتری ، گروه مدیریت، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران
2 استادیار، دانشکده مهندسی کامپیوتر، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران
3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران
4 استادیار، آزمایشگاه معماری سازمانی، دانشکده مهندسی کامپیوتر و فناوری اطلاعات، دانشگاه صنعتی، شیراز، ایران
10.48305/him.2022.39198.1026
چکیده
مقدمه: معماری سازمانی نقش مهمی در هم‌راستایی تغییرات مورد نیاز در قابلیت‌های کسب‌وکار سازمان با چشم‌انداز پیچیده فناوری اطلاعات ایفا می‌کند. در پژوهش حاضر، مدل برنامه‌ریزی قابلیت بر اساس فرایند معماری سازمانی کوبیت 2019 که مدل مرجع حاکمیت فرایند‌‌های سازمانی فناوری اطلاعات است، ارائه ‌شده است.
روش بررسی: این مقاله کیفی و از نوع پژوهش علم طراحی(DSRِ Design Science Research ) بوده که یک چارچوب حل مسئله ساختاری است. نمونه آماری را 47 نفر از خبرگان فاوای دانشگاه‌ها و خبرگان معماری، آگاه به حوزه قابلیت‌های کسب‌وکار تشکیل دادند. روش گردآوری اطلاعات، مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته و پرسشنامه گوگل‌فرم بود. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از روش‌های آماری توصیفی انجام شد و طبق نظر خبرگان ارزیابی شد.
یافته‌ها: با استفاده از پیاده‌سازی مدل برنامه‌ریزی قابلیت بر اساس فرایند مدیریت معماری سازمانی کوبیت در واحد فاوای دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، چشم‌انداز قابلیت، قابلیت‌های سطح دو و سطح سه، طرح ایجاد و توسعه قابلیت‌های شناسایی‌شده، پروژه‌های کاری جهت شناسایی و توسعه قابلیت و خدمات افزوده قابلیت استخراج گردید.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که استفاده از معماری سازمانی در برنامه‌ریزی قابلیت‌های فناوری اطلاعات منجر به شناسایی و تدوین طرح قابلیت جدید «مدیریت داده» و تدوین طرح ارتقای قابلیت در سایر بخش‌ها شامل «مدیریت سامانه‌های نرم‌افزاری»، «مدیریت زیرساخت و شبکه»، «مدیریت آمار» در سطح دوم واحد فاوا گردید

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Presenting a capability planning model based on Cobit organizational architecture management process (Case study: Fava management of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences)

نویسندگان English

somayeh derakhshan 1
Akbar nabiollahi 2
naser khani 3
sayed Raoof khayami 4
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Management, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
2 Assistant Prof., Faculty of Computer Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
3 Assistant Prof., Department of Management, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
4 Assistant Prof., Enterprise Architecture Lab, Department of Computer and Information Technology, University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Enterprise architecture plays an important role in aligning the required changes in the organization's business capabilities with the complex IT landscape. In the current research, the capability planning model is presented based on the Cobit 2019 organizational architecture process, which is the reference model for the governance of information technology organizational processes.

Methods:This study method was qualitative and used from Design Science Research (DSR) method, which is a structural problem solving framework. The statistical sample was made up of 47 university experts and architectural experts, knowledgeable in the field of business capabilities. The data collection method was semi-structured interview and Google form questionnaire. Data analysis was done using descriptive statistical methods and was evaluated according to the opinion of experts.

Results: Using the implementation of the capability planning model based on the Cobit organizational architecture management process in the ICT unit of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, the capability perspective, level two and level three capabilities, the plan to create and develop the identified capabilities, work projects to identify and develop the capability and Additional services were extracted.

Conclusion: The results of this research showed that the use of organizational architecture in the planning of information technology capabilities led to the identification and development of a new capability plan for "data management" and the development of a capability improvement plan in other departments, including "software systems management", "infrastructure and network management". "Management of statistics" became the second level of ICT unit.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Key words Enterprise Architecture
Business Capabilities
Cobit framework
Togaf framework
1. Mikalef P, Pateli A, van de Wetering R. IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and
competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment. European Journal of Information Systems. 2021 Sep 3; 30(5):512-40.
2. COBIT2019. COBIT Governance and Management Objectives,ISACA. 2018.
3. Kaidalova J, Kurt S, Ulf S. How digital transformation affects enterprise architecture management–a case study. International Journal of Information
Systems and Project Management. 2018; 6(3):5-18.
4. Van de Wetering R. Dynamic enterprise architecture capabilities: Conceptualization and validation. InBusiness Information Systems: 22nd International
Conference, BIS 2019, Seville, Spain, June 26–28, 2019, Proceedings, Part II 22 2019 (pp. 221-232). Springer International Publishing.
5. Mishra D, Zema NR, Natalizio E. A high-end IoT devices framework to foster beyond-connectivity capabilities in 5G/B5G architecture. IEEE
Communications Magazine. 2021 Feb 17; 59(1):55-61.
6. Drechsler A, Hevner AR. Utilizing, producing, and contributing design knowledge in DSR projects. InDesigning for a Digital and Globalized World:
13th International Conference, DESRIST 2018, Chennai, India, June 3–6, 2018, Proceedings 13 2018 (pp. 82-97). Springer International Publishing.
7. Gong Y, Janssen M. Roles and capabilities of enterprise architecture in big data analytics technology adoption and implementation. Journal of theoretical
and applied electronic commerce research. 2021 Jan; 16(1):37-51.
8. Mayer N, Aubert J, Grandry E, Feltus C, Goettelmann E, Wieringa R. An integrated conceptual model for information system security risk management
supported by enterprise architecture management. Software & Systems Modeling. 2019 Jun 1; 8: 2285-312.
9. The Open Group (2022), TOGAF Version 10 framework.
10. Van de Wetering R. Dynamic enterprise architecture capabilities and organizational benefits: an empirical mediation study. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2105.10036. 2021 May 18.
11. Van de Wetering R. Understanding the impact of enterprise architecture driven dynamic capabilities on agility: a variance and fsQCA study. Pacific
Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2021 Dec; 13(4):32-68.
12. Pathak S, Krishnaswamy V, Sharma M. Big data analytics capabilities: a novel integrated fitness framework based on a tool-based content analysis.
Enterprise Information Systems. 2021 Jun 12:1-35.
13. Kraetz D, Morawski M. Architecture Patterns—Batch and Real-Time Capabilities. The Digital Journey of Banking and Insurance, Volume III: Data
Storage, Data Processing and Data Analysis. 2021:89-104.
14. Kotusev S, Kurnia S. The theoretical basis of enterprise architecture: A critical review and taxonomy of relevant theories. Journal of Information
Technology. 2021 Sep; 36(3):275-315.
15. Löhe J, Legner C. Overcoming implementation challenges in enterprise architecture management: a design theory for architecture-driven IT
Management (ADRIMA). Information Systems and e-Business Management. 2014 Feb; 12: 101-37.
16. Fahd K, Miah SJ, Ahmed K, Venkatraman S, Miao Y. Integrating design science research and design based research frameworks for developing
education support systems. Education and Information Technologies. 2021 Jul; 26:4027-48.
17. Carter L, Yoon V, Liu D. Analyzing e-government design science artifacts: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information
Management. 2022 Feb 1; 62:102430.
18. Reining S, Ahlemann F, Mueller B, Thakurta R. Knowledge accumulation in design science research: ways to foster scientific progress. ACM SIGMIS
Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems. 2022 Jan 24; 53 (1):10-24.
19. Henriques TA, O’Neill H. Design science research with focus groups–a pragmatic meta-model. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.
2021 May 3(ahead-of-print).
20. Beese J, Haki K, Schilling R, Kraus M, Aier S, Winter R, (Outgoing Editor). Strategic alignment of enterprise architecture management–how portfolios
of control mechanisms track a decade of enterprise transformation at Commerzbank. European Journal of Information Systems. 2022 Jul 10:1-4.
21. Supreme Information Technology Council of the country, Electronic Government Development Commission. Service reference model in Iran's
organizational architecture, version 1. 2015.
22. https://www.newcastle.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/596805/UON-EA-Framework-BCM-v1.1.pdf.
23. DAMA_Guide[Internet].Academia;2020.Availablefrom:https://www.academia.edu/
19992490/The_DAMA_Guide_to_the_Data_Management_Body_of_Knowledge_First_Edition
24. Karkošková S. Data governance model to enhance data quality in financial institutions. Information Systems Management. 2023 Jan 2;40(1):90-110.
25. Vaishnav R, Panditi MDD, Dhiman V, Aarthy CCJ, Kumari YS, Mohiddin MK. Data security in healthcare management analysis and future prospects.
Mater Today Proc. 2022; 51:2202–6.
26. Devaki K, Leena Jenifer L. A Study on Challenges in Data Security During Data Transformation. InComputer Networks, Big Data and IoT: Proceedings
of ICCBI 2021 2022 May 22 (pp. 49-66). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
27. Prasetyo HN, Djepapu RN, Tridalestari FA, Hariman I. Development of project document management system based on data governance with DAMA
International framework. In2018 International Conference on Industrial Enterprise and System Engineering (ICoIESE 2018) 2019 Mar (pp. 109-114).
Atlantis Press.
28. Ceci M, Loglisci C, Ferilli S, Malerba D. Project dama: Document acquisition, management and archiving. InDigital Libraries and Archives:
7th Italian Research Conference, IRCDL 2011, Pisa, Italy, January 20-21, 2011. Revised Papers 7 2011 (pp. 115-118). Springer Berlin
Heidelberg.
مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت
دوره 19، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 84
خرداد و تیر 1401
صفحه 60-70