نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
2 استادیار، علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش شناسی، دانشگاه شهیدباهنر، کرمان، ایران
3 دانشیار، جمعیت شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، گروه مردم شناسی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
4 دکترا، بازیابی اطالعاتو دانش دانشگاه اصفهان وکارشناسی ارشدعلم سنجی دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
چکیده
مقدمه: خوشه‌بندی مفاهیم و شناسایی حوزه‌های جدید مطالعاتی، ازجمله کاربردهای مطالعات ترسیم ساختار علم می‌باشد. پژوهش حاضر باهدف تحلیل هم واژگانی و بررسی ساختار موضوعی تحقیقات حوزه انسان‌شناسی پزشکی انجام شد.
روش بررسی: پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد علم‌سنجی به تحلیل محتوای متون با استفاده از روش هم رخدادی واژگان و تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی انجام شد. از راهبرد جستجوی Topic="Medical Anthropology" در پایگاه WOS درمجموع 1311 مدرک شناسایی شدند. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل خوشه‌ای و نمودار راهبردی انجام‌شده است.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌های مربوط به خوشه‌بندی، منجر به شکل‌گیری هشت خوشه موضوعی شد: «انسان‌شناسی زیست پزشکی»، «ایدز و کوید 19 (اپیدمی‌ها)»، «انسان‌شناسی پزشکی با رویکرد معنویت»، «انسان‌شناسی پزشکی اقتصادی»، «پزشکی قومی»، «انسان‌شناسی پزشکی کاربردی»، «آموزش و فرهنگ‌سازی سلامت» و «انسان‌شناسی تولیدمثل». خوشه «ایدز و کوید 19 (اپیدمی‌ها)»، به‌عنوان خوشه با مرکزیت و تراکم بالا مشخص شد.
نتیجه‌گیری: با استفاده از تحلیل هم واژگانی، به‌خوبی می‌توان ساختار علمی یک حوزه را مشخص نمود. با توجه به فراوانی کلیدواژه‌ها و خوشه‌های به‌دست‌آمده از نمودار راهبردی، مشخص شد که زمینه‌های موضوعی ایدز و کوید 19 (اپیدمی‌ها) مهم‌ترین زمینه‌های نوظهور در این حوزه می‌باشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Analysis of Thematic Structure of Researches in Medical Anthropology Field
نویسندگان [English]
- Fathemeh Makkizadeh 1
- Abolfazl Asadnia 2
- Malihe Alimondegari 3
- Fezzeh Ebrahimi 4
1 Associate professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Social Science Department, Knowledge and Information Science School, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Humanities and Social Science, Knowledge and Information Science Department, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Demography, Department of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
4 PhD ,Information and Knowledge Retrieval, University of Isfahan, Isfahan,Iran
چکیده [English]
Introduction: New applications of studies to draw the structure of science including clustering concepts and identifying new fields of studies. This study was co-word analysis of intellectual structure of knowledge in the field of throbbing headaches.
Methods: The research was conducted adopting a scientometric approach to content analysis of texts using the co-words and social network analysis. A total of 1311 documents were identified from the Topic="Medical Anthropology" search strategy in the WOS database. Data analysis was been done through cluster analysis method and strategic diagram.
Results: The findings related to clustering led to the formation of eight thematic clusters: "Biomedical Anthropology", "AIDS and Covid-19 (epidemics)","Medical Anthropology with a Spiritual Approach", "Economic Medical Anthropology", "Ethnic Medicine", "Medical Anthropology" Applied", "Education and culture of health" and "Anthropology of reproduction". "AIDS and Covid-19 (epidemics)" was determined to be the highest centrality and density cluster.
Conclusion: Using co-word analysis, it is possible to determine the scientific structure of a field. According to the frequency of keywords and clusters obtained from the strategic diagram, it was revealed that the thematic fields of AIDS and Covid-19 (epidemics) are the important emerging fields in this field.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Keywords: Medical anthropology
- co- word analysis
- scientometrics
2. Alexandrakis O. Medical anthropology: The development of the field. The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology. 2001;9(1.)
3. Barnard A, Spencer J. The Routledge encyclopedia of social and cultural anthropology. Routledge; 2009 Dec 4.
4. Sobo EJ. Theoretical and applied issues in cross-cultural health research. Ember M, Ember CR. Encyclopedia of Medical Anthropology: Health and illness in the World’s Cultures. New York: Springer. 2004:3-11.
5. Young A, Rees T. Medical anthropology enters the 21st century. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 2011 Aug 1;199(8):592-6.
6. Becker G. Medical Anthropology in a Time of Change. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 1995 Mar 1;9(1):3-5.
7. Asadnia A, Cheshmeh Sihrabi M. place of Knowledge and information Science in the tree of knowledge. Journaal of studies in Library and Information Science 2020, 12 (1): 73-90 [In Persian].
8. Chang YW, Huang MH, Lin CW. Evolution of research subjects in library and information science based on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics. 2015 Dec;105(3):2071-87.
9. Gualdi-Russo E, Fonti G. Recent trend and perspectives in forensic anthropology: a bibliometric analysis. Collegium antropologicum. 2013 Jul 1;37(2):595-9.
10. Madadin M, Siddique N, Waris A, Khan MA, Albarbari HS, Atreya A, Sabri I, Owaidah SF, Menezes RG. Research trends in forensic anthropology: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2022 Jan 5:102305.
11. Lei G, Liu F, Liu P, Zhou Y, Jiao T, Dang YH. Worldwide tendency and focused research in forensic anthropology: A bibliometric analysis of decade (2008–2017). Legal Medicine. 2019 Mar 1;37:67-75.
12. Shi G, Liu N, Yu X, Zhang H, Li S, Wu S, Wang W, Huang P, Li C. Bibliometric analysis of medical malpractice literature in legal medicine from 1975 to 2018: Web of Science review. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2019 Aug 1;66:167-83.
13. Şenel E. Health and ancient beliefs: a scientometric analysis of health literature related to shamanism, paganism and spirituality. Journal of religion and health. 2019 Dec;58(6).
14. Hernández-Torrano D, Ibrayeva L, Sparks J, Lim N, Clementi A, Almukhambetova A, Nurtayev Y, Muratkyzy A. Mental health and well-being of university students: A bibliometric mapping of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020 Jun 9;11:1226.
15. Wang, L.; Notton, A.; Surpatean, A. "Interdisiplinarity of nano resea fields: a keyword mining approach". Scientometrics,2013, 213. 94: 877-892.
16. .Makkizadeh F. Intellectual structure of knowledge in Nanomedicine field (2009 to 2018): A Co-Word Analysis. Nanomedicine Research Journal. 2019 Apr 1;4(2):101-10.
17. Makkizadeh F, Mostafavi I, Hajizadeh BA. An Analysis of Medical Ethics Research In The International Arena. Medical Ethics Journal. 2019, 13 (44) [In Persian].
18. .Hsu WC, Li JH. Visualising and mapping the intellectual structure of medical big data. Journal of Information Science. 2019 Apr;45(2):239-58.
19. Baji F, Azadeh F, Parsai-Mohammadi Parasaee P, Shoukat P. Mapping Intellectual Structure of Health Literacy Area Based on Co-Word Analysis in Web of Science Database during 1993-2017. Health Literacy Information 2018; 15(3): 139-145. [In Persian]
20. .Matin P. Anthropology in medicine, introduction to medical anthropology. Tehran: Safir Ardahal. 2010.
21. Johnston FE, Low SM. Biomedical anthropology: An emerging synthesis in anthropology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology.1984;27(S5):215-27.
22. Calcaterra G, Bassareo PP, Barilla F, Romeo F, de Gregorio C, Mehta P, Mehta JL. Syndemic: a synergistic anthropological approach to the COVID-19 pandemic. Encyclopedia. 2022 Jul 13;2(3.)
23. Claus PJ. Medical anthropology and the ethnography of spirit possession. Contributions to Asian Studies. 1984;18(1):60-72.
24. Heusser P, Scheffer C, Neumann M, Tauschel D, Edelhäuser F. Towards non-reductionistic medical anthropology, medical education and practitioner–patient-interaction: The example of Anthroposophic Medicine. Patient education and counseling. 2012 Dec 1;89(3):455-60.
25. Scheper‐Hughes N, Lock MM. The mindful body: A prolegomenon to future work in medical anthropology. Medical anthropology quarterly.1987 Mar;1(1):6-41.
26. Morsy S. The missing link in medical anthropology: The political economy of health. Reviews in Anthropology. 1979 Jun 1;6(3):349-63.
27. O’Connor BB, Hufford DJ. Understanding folk medicine. Healing logics: Culture and medicine in modern health belief systems. 2001:13-35.
28. .Hufford DJ. Folk medicine and health culture in contemporary society. Primary care: clinics in office practice. 1997 Dec 1;24(4):723-41.
29. Pelto PJ, Pelto GH. Studying knowledge, culture, and behavior in applied medical anthropology. Medical anthropology quarterly. 1997 Jun;11(2):147-63.
30. Walker S. Health interventions: a focus for applied medical anthropology theory. NEXUS: The Canadian Student Journal of Anthropology.1998 Jan 1;13(1).
31. Winkelman M. Culture and health: Applying medical anthropology. John Wiley & Sons; 2008 Dec 5.
32. Mason KA, Willen SS, Holmes SM, Herd DA, Nichter M, Castañeda H, Hansen H. How Do You Build a “Culture of Health”? A Critical Analysis of Challenges and Opportunities from Medical Anthropology. Population health management. 2020 Dec 1;23(6):476-81.
33. Andaya E, Kotni ME. The Anthropology of Reproduction. A Companion to Medical Anthropology. United State: John Wiley & Sons Ltd , 2022 p:213-229.
34. . Andaya E, El Kotni M. Socio-Cultural Approaches to the Anthropology of Reproduction. Oxford Bibliographies Online. 2018.
)